Friday, October 12, 2012

the knowledge of good and evil


A few days ago I wrote a short paper on the expulsion of Adam and Eve from the garden.  The last comment that my professor made at the end of the paper was this:  "Is the Genesis narrative somehow suggesting that the ideal life is eternal ignorance?"  My professor's question warrants further discussion.  Is eternal ignorance the ideal?


In Ajax, one of the seven tragedies by Greek playwright Sophocles (5th BCE), the central character, Ajax, says the following to his baby boy:

"O my son, may you become more fortunate than your father with respect to wickedness, but like him in other things!  Please don't become wicked!  Even now I have jealousy for you, in this at least: that you perceive nothing of wicked things.  For the sweetest life rests by no means in understanding, it lasts until you learn joy and sorrow" (550-555; my translation).

It is not eternal ignorance that is ideal, but the ignorance of good and evil.  That is to say, ignorance of the dichotomy separating something "good" from something "evil."  If there were no evil, no rebellion, then there would be no dichotomy.  This is what I will call "the ideal of Edenic ignorance."  Once more, this is not "ignorance" as it is generally construed, but the ignorance of the separation between something "good" and something "evil," which, if evil exists, is a necessary distinction.  Only after humankind disobeyed this all-good God of love, through temptation and mistrust, was there a need to distinguish the "moral quality" of actions.  In Edenic ignorance these primeval humans only needed to know (intimate, personal knowledge, not academic) the good God who walked with them in the cool of the day--and, of course, the names of all the rad animals.

And that very God is remaking it all.  Right now.  The leaves of the Tree of Life, from which we were once banished, are now for the healing of the nations.  The first exile was from Eden, from that place of no dichotomy [between good and evil], to a place of dichotomy.  If 'place' is confusing, then think of it as a state of being.  We are exiled out of the intended state of being -- that of no moral distinction between any word or deed -- and into a place running rampant with gross manifestations of evil, full of dichotomies.


One who walks in the power and knowledge of Jesus the Messiah is brought out of that exile.  There's a new Exodus, and it's happening right now.  I suggest you get your staff and satchel and join us, we're learning to bear the light of love and justice in this strange and dangerous planet.


It begins now and continues into the not-yet.  Live here, today.  God is here now.

The knowledge of God is where we begin:

“Knowing about God is crucially important for the living of our lives. As it would be cruel to an Amazonian tribesman to fly him to London, put him down without explanation in Trafalgar Square and leave him, as one who knew nothing of English or England, to fend for himself, so we are cruel to ourselves if we try to live in this world without knowing about the God whose world it is and who runs it. The world becomes a strange, mad, painful place, and life in it a disappointing and unpleasant business, for those who do not know about God. Disregard the study of God, and you sentence yourself to stumble and blunder through life blindfolded, as it were, with no sense of direction and no understanding of what surrounds you. This way you can waste your life and lose your soul."  J.I. Packer, Knowing God

5 comments:

  1. Having experienced evil instead of remaining in eternal ignorance of it, I think, greatly increases our thankfulness and love for God.

    Augustine has a great response to is son Adeodatus. (Paraphrase) Adeodatus asked Augustine "could God have not made man so that he wouldn't sin?" To which Augustine replied: "of course he could have, but the greatest joy a human can experience is in freely turning to God, so he didn't want to deprive us of that."

    Augustine almost always has interesting input.

    More importantly, Life after evil in the age to come....STOKED!!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hmm, good point! I'll have to think that through...

    I'm not sure I agree with Augustine on that point. But I'm also not sure that this is an accurate reading of Augustine. God created us so that we could choose against him because he wanted us to be able to choose him out of love. Otherwise he would only have a bunch of grateful servants and no children. What's more, Augustine argued that evil isn't actually a thing. It is the absence of good attained through selfishness. The greatest joy that a human can experience *after* evil entered the world is turning to God. My argument is that there was actually more joy and peace and contentment *before*.

    Augustine, City of God:

    "The choice of the will, then, is genuinely free only when it is not subservient to faults and sins. God gave it true freedom, and now that it has been lost, *through its own fault,* it can be restored only by him who had the power to give it at the beginning."

    So true freedom was already in place in the garden, and that true freedom existed in ignorance of evil. The restoration to that freedom comes from Jesus now, and will be made full when we're rescued from the first exile, our exile from the garden, when recreation happens.

    And we have to remember the text of Genesis 6:5-6

    "The Lord saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every intention of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. And the Lord regretted that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him to his heart."

    I think this is explanation enough that, biblically, God did not want men to live in evil in order to make love better. Love doesn't require evil.

    Here's a great article on Augustine: http://www.str.org/site/News2?page=NewsArticle&id=5124

    But yeah, like you said, Life after evil is what it's all about :)

    john

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Fist, I'm now realizing how vague and truncated my comment was. Sorry for my text-communication stupidity!

    The passage I paraphrased is from "De Magistro," but I'm not able to find it to check myself. But I don't see what is inconsistent about it. From my understanding of Augustine, God gave us freedom so that we could freely turn to him. That freedom needs to be absolute freedom, in order that the love could be entirely genuine. God doesn't want an ounce of "forced" servitude from us, he wants us to love him like children love parents. and so that absolute freedom includes the possibility of rejecting God. God made man absolutely free so that man could freely love him, but that included the risk that we could reject him. Having rejected God, we are now in servitude to a multiplicity of idols.

    If you heard the quote as saying that God intended for us to reject him, pardon my awful paraphrase. I don't think (and I don't think Augustine thought) anything like that.

    You are absolutely right in pointing out that Genesis passage, there are many like it that show God's deep sorrow over our rebellion. God is not some unmoved mover of the Aristotelians and Thomists, who wound up the history of the world "fall-and-all." God is the MOST moved mover. He is deeply troubled by our rebellion that WE brought about. He has been tirelessly luring us back to "the garden" so to speak, in increasingly powerful ways, culminating in the death of Jesus himself.

    I was just throwing it out there because I think Augustine is right in saying that there is no greater that joy we can experience, than that which we experience as recipients of grace.

    What I mean by my first comment is that we probably have a greater appreciation and thankfulness for what God has done for us when we have experienced the alternative. Our greater darkness causes God's light to shine ever brighter. If we were ignorant of the alternative (this darkness), we wouldn't be seeing the light so brightly. Same light, different setting. (Like in diamond stores where they display diamonds against a black backdrop so they "pop" more).

    Are we better off knowing this darkness? ABSOLUTELY NOT!! All I mean is that the joy experienced in laying down servitude to sin and turning to the Fountain of Living water is an experience that "the garden" didn't have. The struggle with sin is certainly not worth it, but God's glory (though no different than it was before) radiates brighter when it shines through the cracks of these broken lives.

    And this...
    "The choice of the will, then, is genuinely free only when it is not subservient to faults and sins. God gave it true freedom, and now that it has been lost, *through its own fault,* it can be restored only by him who had the power to give it at the beginning."

    Yes.
    That.
    Bring on the restoration.
    Amen.

    ReplyDelete